DERARTMENT OF THE NAVY
apn FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL REGORDS
1
701 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 4004
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
DIC
Docket No. NR2515-14
26 Aug 14
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj:
Ref: (a) Title 10 u.¢.c. 1552
Enel: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) NPC memo 1160 ser 813/166 dtd } Aug 14
(3) Subject’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
to establish entitlement to a zone “Bp” Selective Reenlistment Bonus
(SRB).
2. The Board, consisting of Mr. zealman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin,
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on
25 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consigted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.
b, In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action.
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to
show that:
a. The immediate reenlistment contract (MAXIDERS ra7n/6ol).
executed on or about 7 March 2013, is modified to read “6 years” vice
“3 years”. Note: Petitioner was approved for the Obligated Service to
Train (OTT) program. Furthermore, he graduated/reenlisted from NEC
5342 on 7 March 2013.
b. This change will entitle the Petitoner to a zone “B” SRB with
an award level of 4.0 ($75,000 dollar award ceiling) for the ND/5342
rate/NEC. ©
ce. A copy of this Report of proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.
4. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board's review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing 1s 4 vid complete record of
the Board’s proceedings in the above ¢
ROBERT D. 7S ALMAN
Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
{32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e})} and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under tne authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of che
Navy .
26 Aug 14
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01374-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish increased entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for NEC 5342. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Kastner, and Milner, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 April 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03810-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH: ddj Docket No: 3810-01 14 August 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) BUPERS memorandum 1160 PERS 8 15 of 12 July 2001 (3) Subject ’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 11689 11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD ARLINGTON, VA 22204 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07078-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone 5342. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Agresti, Beckett, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 23 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02090-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to’a zone 5342. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Lightle, and allegations of error and injustice on 17 July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00900-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a} Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 26 May 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07406-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 December 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 13118-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON BC 20370-5100 DUC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitiomer’s allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10042-08
10042-08 24 March 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records LO: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICQ 0 Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr.Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07492-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 February 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...